10-4

cpan:fooist it is.

Sent from my iPhone

Daniel Lathrop (@lathropd)
Mobile: (206) 718-0349 
PGP key: https://keybase.io/lathropd (raw) 

> On Aug 28, 2020, at 9:51 AM, Ralph Mellor <ralphdjmel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> You can alter <auth> to whatever (it just needs to be a string...
> 
> Larry may comment, but in case not, or, if he does, to save him
> some time and give him something to correct, here's my take on
> what he specified^H^H^H^H^Hulated.
> 
> @Larry defined the auth to be a URI.
> 
> Quoting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier:
> 
>> A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a string of characters that
>> unambiguously identifies a particular resource.
> ...
>> The most common form of URI is the Uniform Resource Locator (URL)
> ...
>> More rarely seen in usage is the Uniform Resource Name (URN) ..
>> .for the identification of resources in particular namespaces.
> 
> So, rarely, but sometimes, a URI is an URN.
> 
> Larry didn't specify a URN but rather a URI. So I think he was allowing
> us to go either the URL or URN route. If so, then this perhaps "strangely"
> mirrors his choice of auth as being ambiguously either author or authority.
> 
> But I think, in general, he tilted URN in his examples.
> 
> Continuing with Wikipedia:
> 
>> [G]eneric syntax consists of a hierarchical sequence of five components:
>> URI = scheme:[//authority]path[?query][#fragment]
> 
> So, at its simplest, scheme:path.
> 
> Larry's examples were things like cpan:JRANDOM and github:raiph.
> 
> The Wikipedia page has a section on URI resolution including:
> 
>> Resolving a URI reference against a base URI results in a target URI.
>> The base URI can be obtained, in order of precedence, from:
> ...
>> the context of the application.
> 
> So I think the idea here is that our toolchain determines how the
> string is interpreted.
> 
> So, yes, you can type any string, but that string has a specific
> meaning determined by the toolchain.
> 
> And toolchain tools "should" be sensible, and follow @Larry's
> guidance. Which is to start with, and perhaps stick with, `foo:bar`,
> where:
> 
> * `foo` is one of whatever "schemes" we adopt; which we can for
>  now assume correspond repo domain names -- cpan, github, ...
> 
> * `bar` is a username that's unique within the given scheme.
> 
> --
> love, raiph
> 

Reply via email to