Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What happens if unicode supported uppercase and lowercase numbers? > [I had a dig about, and it doesn't seem to mention lowercase or > uppercase digits. Are they just a typography distinction, and hence not > enough to be worthy of codepoints?] Damned if I know; I didn't know there even was such a thing. Uppercase vs. lowercase for letters is more than a typographic distinction for many languages; there are words in English, for example, with a different meaning depending on whether they're capitalized (since capitalization indicates a proper noun). If there is some similar distinction of meaning for numbers in some language, I suppose that Unicode may add such a thing; to date, there doesn't appear to be any concept of uppercase or lowercase for anything but letters. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Russ Allbery
- RE: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Garrett Goebel
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Nick Ing-Simmons
- RE: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Buddha Buck
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Nicholas Clark
- RE: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Hong Zhang
- RE: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... NeonEdge
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish crit... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish crit... Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: Should we care much about this Unicode-ish criticism... Hong Zhang