> On 10 Jul 2020, at 23:37, Brad Gilbert <b2gi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I honestly think that there is an argument to be made that it shouldn't even > be possible to write a `subset` without a `where` clause.
Making the "where" clause non-optional, is remarkably simple: removing a '?' However, there appear to be quite a lot of tests in roast that depend on this behaviour, so either there *is* a perceived use of subsets without "where" clause, or we need to fix roast first.
