[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : > What should $foo = (1,2,3) do now? Should it be the same as what : > $foo = [1,2,3]; did in Perl 6? (This is assuming that $foo=@INC does what : > $foo = \@INC; does now.) Putting it another way: does a list in scalar : > context turn into a reference, or is it just arrays that do that? : : Just arrays, I believe. That hasn't actually been decided yet. There are good arguments on both sides. Larry
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Simon Cozens
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Graham Barr
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Graham Barr
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Graham Barr
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Simon Cozens
- Re: Coupla Questions Larry Wall
- Re: Coupla Questions Graham Barr
- Re: Coupla Questions Simon Cozens
- Re: Coupla Questions Graham Barr
- Re: Coupla Questions Brent Dax
- Re: Coupla Questions David L. Nicol
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Simon Cozens
- Re: Coupla Questions Graham Barr
- Re: Coupla Questions Damian Conway
- Re: Coupla Questions Simon Cozens