> On 19 Jan 2020, at 00:24, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <perl6-us...@perl.org> > wrote: > Wonderful so far. But then he DOES not describe what > "infix, prefix, postfix, circumfix, postcircumfix" > arfe/means before jumping into details. This is bad > form in technical writing.
s/he/it/ > Again, wonderful so far. But then he DOES not describe > what "infix, prefix, postfix, circumfix, postcircumfix" > are/means before jumping into details. This is also > bad form in technical writing. s/he/it/ > You meed to start at the simple and move methodically > to the complex, especially when dealing with unicorn > words that a specific to a topic. infix: foo + bar prefix: +foo postfix: foo++ circumfix: [foo] postcircumfix: foo[bar]
