Thanks everyone,
I wonder, should I file an issue at rakudo's?
Marcel
Programs are compiled in memory, it just isn't written out to disk.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 3:33 AM Marcel Timmerman <mt1...@gmail.com
<mailto:mt1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
@yary
Thanks for your answer. I've done it too and saw the same kind of
result. But then I thought I've read it somewhere that programs
are not compiled, only modules. So I must write a module to check it.
But if anyone knows, it would be faster ;-)
Regards,
marcel
On 20-10-2019 22:59, yary wrote:
Seems like we can answer "Is it also true when compiling?" by
putting the REPL code into a file!
$ cat order-execution.raku
class Y { method y (Int $y) {note $y}}
my Y $y .= new;
sub b (Int $i --> Int) { note "about to increment i above $i"; $i
+ 10 }
say b(10);
say $y.?y(b(11));
say $y.?undef(b(12));
$ perl6 order-execution.raku
about to increment i above 10
20
about to increment i above 11
21
True
about to increment i above 12
Nil
$ perl6 --version
/This is Rakudo Star version 2019.03.1 built on MoarVM version
2019.03 //implementing Perl 6.d./
Yes Rakudo is executing the args for something that it doesn't
end up calling. Seems overly-eager for a language that is
properly lazy by design. I'd be interested in seeing
documentation for this order-of-operations if it exists.
By the way I had to look up .? -
https://docs.perl6.org/language/operators#index-entry-methodop_.%3F
methodop |.?|
<https://docs.perl6.org/language/operators#___top>
Safe call operator. |$invocant.?method| calls method
|method| on |$invocant| if it has a method of such name.
Otherwise it returns Nil <https://docs.perl6.org/type/Nil>.
Technically, not a real operator; it's syntax special-cased
in the compiler.
-y
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:12 AM Marcel Timmerman
<mt1...@gmail.com <mailto:mt1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello all,
I've a small question where I want to know what is processed
first in
the following line
$my-object.?"my-method"(some-complex-argument-calculation())
Will the sub 'some-complex-argument-calculation()' always be
run even
when 'my-method' is not available because the sub must be
executed
before the method is called.
In the REPL the sub is called despite a method is not
defined. Is it
also true when compiling?
> class Y { method y (Int $y) {note $y}}
(Y)
> my Y $y .= new
Y.new
>sub b (Int $i --> Int) { note "$i"; $i + 10 }
&b
> b(10)
10
20
> $y.?y(b(10))
10
20
True
> $y.?undef(b(10))
10
Nil
Regards
Marcel
