In that bioinformatics data, is there another logical record separator? If so,
and $lrs contains the logical record separator, you could do this:
for "filename".IO.lines(:nl-in($lrs)) {
.say
}
the :nl-in indicates the line separator to be used when reading a file.
> On 21 Oct 2019, at 01:11, Joseph Brenner <doom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, that looks good. At the moment I was thinking about cases
> where there's no need division by lines or words (like say,
> hypothetically bioinformatics data: very long strings no line breaks).
>
> On 10/20/19, Elizabeth Mattijsen <l...@dijkmat.nl> wrote:
>>> On 20 Oct 2019, at 23:38, Joseph Brenner <doom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I was just thinking about the case of processing a large file in
>>> chunks of an arbitrary size (where "lines" or "words" don't really
>>> work). I can think of a few approaches that would seem kind-of
>>> rakuish, but don't seem to be built-in anywhere... something like a
>>> variant of "slurp" with an argument to specify how much you want to
>>> slurp at a time, that'll move on to the next chunk the next time it's
>>> invoked...
>>>
>>> Is there anything like that kicking around that I've missed?
>>
>> Remember that lines and words are lazy, so do you really need to process in
>> chunks?
>>
>> If you do, you can build the chunks easily with X lines, you could do:
>>
>> for "filename".IO.lines(:!chomp).batch(3) -> @batch {
>> say .join;
>> }
>>
>> Similarly for words, of course. Note the use of :!chomp to keep the
>> newlines. If you don't want them, just don't specify it: removing newlines
>> is the default.
