On 7/13/19 12:37 PM, Timo Paulssen wrote:
I wouldn't put "is inlinable" in the docs; it requires the user to put a
QAST tree in the value, which isn't a thing an end-user would touch,
IMO. In fact I'm not sure why we have a trait for that at all, since
it's not used anywhere in rakudo's source.
On 13/07/2019 12:33, Marcel Timmerman wrote:
Hi,
I found out about a trait 'is inlinable' when I made a typo in using a
trait on subs. There is no documentation for it so I thought maybe it
is not implemented, experimental or some other reason it is kept out
of the docs. Otherwise it should be documented too.
Great work on the documentation, still learning a lot from it.
Regards,
Marcel
Thanks @Timo
I have used it here and there without any arguments. Can not see if it
helps.
Btw, is rakudo finding out itself if routines are inlinable and what
algorithm is it using? I have this question to see if one can influence
this process and nudge the routine into inlining.
