At 03:26 PM 5/29/2001 -0700, Larry Wall wrote: >Dan Sugalski writes: >: Nah, bytecode'll have an endianness marker at the top. If you load in >: bytecode with the wrong endianness, the loader will have to swap for you. > >Er. If they're not bytes, we can't call it bytecode. Okay--Parrot Object Code. (If I was feeling cleverer at the moment, I'd come up with a name that has a snappier acronym. Alas I'm not... :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Hong Zhang
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Larry Wall
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dave Mitchell
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons