At 02:24 PM 5/27/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Bryan C. Warnock writes:
>I'd like to see activity on the topics behind:
> * perl6-stdlib
> * perl6-build
>Dan, Graham--should these lists persist in their current form?
Got me, as I'm not on either set.
>It looks like the perl6-internals-api-{embed,parser,syntax-tree} lists
>represent too much fragmentation, and that the perl6-internals list is
>where that discussion will take place. Dan?
Yeah, those can go. One of those "Seemed like a good idea at the time" things.
>We'd need Chip's okay to close the Topaz list. I don't know what he
>would like to do with it.
Is Chip back from Saturn, then? :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
