Only if the routine has an easily defined return Type. Many do not. On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 12:41, Curt Tilmes <c...@tilmes.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:31 AM Todd Chester via perl6-users < > perl6-us...@perl.org> wrote: > >> I was asking because sometimes the documentation for routines does >> not give a --> and I find having to dig around to figure out what >> the return is to be time consuming and confusing. >> >> Based on what Larry stated, I do believe that the documentation >> should always have a --> in the definition line. This was >> my question, not whether or not I should write a definition >> line for my own subs. >> > > I agree. The documentation should always describe the routine with a --> > > Curt > > -- Simon Proctor Cognoscite aliquid novum cotidie http://www.khanate.co.uk/
