Hi El jue., 4 oct. 2018 a las 20:48, Trey Harris (<t...@lopsa.org>) escribió:
> > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 02:13 JJ Merelo <jjmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> El jue., 4 oct. 2018 a las 3:36, Trey Harris (<t...@lopsa.org>) escribió: >> >>> _All_ routines in Perl 6 return _something._ A lack of a "-->" simply >>> indicates stylistically that the return is not useful because it's whatever >>> "falls off the end". (There's a bit of variance here as I'm not sure it's a >>> convention everyone has followed.) It's equivalent to "--> Mu" because >>> anything that could "fall of the end" is Mu. >>> >> >> No, it means that it's not constrained to a type. It can still return >> something, but it can be anything. >> > > > I get all that, except for the "No" at the front. ;-) > I think it referred to the part "the return is not useful". It might or might not be useful, only it will not be constrained. But took me a while, so I get that you didn't get that... JJ
