Dave Storrs wrote:
> Second: I'm afraid that even after all this discussion and puzzling over
> this table for a bit, I'm still a bit baffled by this stuff. Perhaps I'm
> just slow, but let's assume for the sake of argument that I'm not the only
> one still scratching his head. Could we revist the idea of alternate
> syntax to disambiguate between value and variable cases?
I have already been discussing this with Larry and have privately sent
him a complete proposal that, I believe, addresses all these issues.
Let's wait and see what he makes of that proposal.
> (note that this does away with
> the (+spot).bark syntax that some people feel is ugly):
That's been addressed in my latest proposal too.
Damian
