On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:36:59PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote: > > print keys $foo.prop; # prints "NumberHeard" > > print values $foo.prop; # prints "loneliestever" This is an example of one of my concerns about namespace overlap with methods. What would happen if there was a method called prop ? Have we basically said that there cannot be a method called prop ? Personally I would rather see something other than . for accessing properties. As things stand the functionality of a working program can be completely changed/broken by defining a sub that conflicts with a property. Graham.
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Graham Barr
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Piers Cawley
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Edward Peschko
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Michael G Schwern
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Damian Conway
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Edward Peschko
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Damian Conway
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Damian Conway
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Michael G Schwern
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance John Siracusa
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Graham Barr
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Damian Conway
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Graham Barr
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Larry Wall
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Johan Vromans
- Re: 'is' and action at a distance Uri Guttman
- more slots in the glob, 'but', Re: 'is' and action ... David L. Nicol