Ah, OK, you didn't mean override WHAT itself, but get an ersatz what in
some other way. Got it. Thanks.

El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 21:32, Brad Gilbert (<b2gi...@gmail.com>)
escribió:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:16 PM, JJ Merelo <jjmer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is what the documentation says: https://docs.perl6.org/syntax/WHAT
> > You can override it, but we'll pay no attention anyway, basically. So you
> > can't achieve it otherwise, I guess.
>
> It is easy to achieve.
>
>     sub user-made-what ( ::Type ) { Type }
>
>     say 42.&user-made-what; # says (Int)
>
> >
> > El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 21:14, JJ Merelo (<jjmer...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> El mar., 12 jun. 2018 a las 21:11, Brandon Allbery (<
> allber...@gmail.com>)
> >> escribió:
> >>>
> >>> I should clarify this, but I'm not recalling full details at the moment
> >>> which is why I didn't originally.
> >>>
> >>> Perl uses a metaobject protocol (MOP, which you'll see in various
> places
> >>> in the docs). The "macro" to access the metaobject is the .HOW
> >>> pseudo-method. If you do this for a normal class or object of that
> class,
> >>> you get Perl6::Metamodel::ClassHOW back. This is what the .^method
> syntax is
> >>> accessing; it's short for (thing).HOW.method((thing), ...). The
> metaclass
> >>> doesn't magically know its children, so the object has to be used once
> to
> >>> get at its metaclass and a second time to tell the metaclass what it
> is to
> >>> introspect.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not seeing documentation for what .WHAT actually does; it
> (correctly)
> >>> notes that it's implemented specially within the compiler (hence
> "macro")
> >>> but not how you achieve it otherwise. Then again, .HOW has the same
> issue;
> >>> there's a bit of a bootstrapping issue with getting at the metamodel,
> you
> >>> need to have it first. Which is why it's wired into the compiler and
> gets
> >>> those uppercase pseudo-method names.
> >>
> >>
> >> All the metamodel is not exactly part of the language; it's part of the
> >> compiler. So it's in the gray NOT-SPECCED zone regarding documentation
> of
> >> "Perl 6" the language, as oposed to "Perl 6, the implementation by
> Rakudo".
> >> But it's a gray zone and sometimes you fall short of documenting things
> like
> >> WHAT. I'll see what we can in that area.
> >>
> >> JJ
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > JJ
>


-- 
JJ

Reply via email to