On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:31:44 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Unfortunately there's no easy way to know how many elements are there. If I > recall correctly, stringy ranges may loop forever due to normalization and > other things.
Can't think of anything reasonable either, especially since more-than-one-char string endpoints on Ranges go through sequence operator that does all of that arcane, per-char magic. Rejecting this.