Yeah. It was resolved here I think: (2014-12-08) https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/fbc87d2a6bbfc4899b0740119ac8696cc27f1f59
｢testneeded｣ On 2014-12-09 04:54:08, r...@hoelz.ro wrote: > On Sun Dec 07 07:41:52 2014, masak wrote: > > masak (>): > > > I am not 100% sure the `&block (Dog --> Bool)` form should work, > > > or is by spec. The `&block:(Dog --> Bool)` form comes from > > > S06:1675. > > > > <TimToady> at one point we required a : because of the ambiguity with > > sublists of parameters, but we already have a whitespace dep with > > @foo[3,3] vs @foo [$x,$y,$z], so having one for () is probably not > > terrible > > * masak adds TimToady's comment to the ticket > > This bug has largely been resolved; closure parameters now parse > correctly and work, except when used to decide between different multi > candidates.
