On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:25:34AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 04:04:52PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote:
> > yes, that there shouldn't need to be - at least in the 'use warnings' 
> > department.
> 
> Oh, you wanted warnings to be on by default? Oh well.

Exactly. This has not been finalized in an Apocalypse - hence the question 
whether or not it has been 'blessed'.

So - has this decision been made?

> Maybe. But what Damian wrote shows that you can write Perl 5 and it'll
> still work; this is, perhaps, a far more importnat lesson.

fine.. except if it was about TMTOWTDI, both could have been included...

Ed

Reply via email to