https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-10-21#i_15334639
I' think we should test that both are listed, and we can close the ticket. On 2017-10-13 04:50:32, elizabeth wrote: > > On 13 Oct 2017, at 07:52, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > > <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > > > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > > # Please include the string: [perl #132283] > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > > # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132283 > > > > > > > Code: > > class Foo { has $.bar }; my $f = Foo.new(bar=>'u'); say $f.^methods; > > > > ¦«2015.12»: > > (bar) > > > > ¦«2016.06»: > > (bar) > > > > ¦«2016.12»: > > (bar) > > > > ¦«2017.06»: > > (bar) > > > > ¦«f72be0f130cf»: > > (bar BUILDALL) > > > > > > > > Bisectable points at two relevant commits: > > First it was BUILDALL_UNDER_CONSTRUCTION after > > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/9837687d93c907ec232b1c7635776aa0c7faa6bc > > Now it is BUILDALL after > > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/63cf246fd4caa43c52a212054a98e9b450c54127 > > > > > > I don't know if BUILDALL should be listed or not. My gut feeling says > > that it shouldn't be, but feel free to argue otherwise. I'm just the > > messenger. > > Well, it *is* an auto-generated method that is installed in the > namespace. Just like “bar”. So either we should show both, or > neither. Or introduce a flag to include/exclude auto-generated > methods. But then we would need to mark those methods as auto- > generated somehow.
