I don't think that extreme positions ("minimalist!" "bloater!") helps here. I think the important question to ask about any given feature is: what will it let me do? Features with no good answer to this question obviously have no place in core. Attempting to align with one or another philosophical camp before pragmatically evaluating the benefits of something seems a waste of everyone's time. Nat
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Greg Boug
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 \} David L. Nicol
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 \} Dan Sugalski