David L. Nicol writes:
: Demonstrating, the p5 "cast" can be performed.  I guess p6 will
: optimize any @{[...]} constructions into @(...) but still accept
: it as valid, deprecated syntax?

Why should it be deprecated?

Oh, are you wondering because I said that @{foo[bar]} was no longer
valid?  Just because @{foo[bar]} is gone doesn't mean that @{foo}[bar]
is gone.  It's just that, in strings, @{foo}[bar] means something a
little different now, namely, exactly what it means outside of
strings.  But @{[...]} should work just the same as it did, in the
absence of any subscripts or method calls on the right.

Larry

Reply via email to