> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:55:36AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > > > If you talk that way, people are going to start believing it. > [snip] > > Some of us are are talking that way because we already > beleive it. You can't make the transition from Attic > Greek to Koine without changing how people fundamentally > view their language. Apocalypse two made me a believer. The changes are beautiful. It's calling it "Perl" and relying on subliminal pursuasion to ask users to consider it the same that bothers me. That's a very Microsoftish tactic. To me, any change, regardless of how small or great it may be, that alters a language in a way that will require maintenance to come into "standard", is not a change, but a fork. (Regardless of translators. I'm afraid that this will be as much vapourware as B::.) p
- Re: Perl, the new generation David Goehrig
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- RE: Perl, the new generation Sam Tregar
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Edward Peschko
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Edward Peschko
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove