I do understand the operand-operator idea now, but I think that allowing
the same symbol to be both operand and operator is a terrible idea.
Feel free to disagree, I'm not going to argue that point.
Otherwise:
And since nobody is going to use that > > Yes! Exactly. You've put the nail in
your own coffin with that one.
I rejected that detail as an argument already.
Also, I find this kind of gloat pretty abusive, which takes a lot out of
my interest in this kind of discussion with you.
Also, you didn't care enough to actually understand the argument I was
putting forth.
All things considered, I'm dropping out of this discussion.
No hard feelings actually, I just don't want to force my perspective on
people who clearly have no interest in it, that would just be a waste of
everybody's time.
