[on David Nicol's thought that maybe references should be treated differently than other scalar data] > >But $, @, and % indicate data organization, not type... > Perhaps it's a mistake that Perl treats numbers and strings the same. Perhaps "$" should be broken out into two prefixes: S for strings, and | for numbers. Use $ when it's unknown what type a variable will hold, or for a variable that can hold either type. Sfoo = 'a string'; |bar = 'a number'; $baz = Sfoo || |bar; And references are right out. ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Eric J. Roode [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Engineer, Myxa Corporation
- what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Matt Youell
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Dan Sugalski
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation Eric Roode
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Matt Youell
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Michael G Schwern
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens