As already mentioned, we have three such stubbers already. You can even put a partial/incomplete implementation after them: just terminate the ... or w/e with a semicolon.
What none of them will do for you is allow a syntactically incorrect body. But the proposed feature *also* will not allow that; you'd have to do it as a slang to get that, and even then I suspect you will find error recovery / parser resynchronization to be nontrivial. On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is so easy for a programmer to implement; I have an "nyi" > subroutine/function in the my skeleton scripts for both Perl 5 and > Bash. Is it worth cluttering the language? > -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
