On 09/03/17 20:38, jn...@jnthn.net via RT wrote: > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:39:39 -0800, elizabeth wrote: >> But I’ll settle for a warning / exceptione :-) > I think these options are worth consideration. I can't think of a false > positive off hand.
class Test { method tester { say "testest" } }
# warning: you're not allowed to close over variable &say!
is there a sane heuristic for this? "does it have a & sigil" isn't sane,
IMO, and neither is "does it come from the core setting?".
