John Porter writes: : Pardon me if someone has already suggested this, but... : Couldn't labels really be (aliases to) iterator objects? : So that : next FOO : really *does* mean : FOO.next Ordinary "next" methods don't do a goto. Larry
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Fred Heutte
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Fred Heutte
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Eric Roode
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Eric Roode
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- qX (was Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns) Uri Guttman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns James Mastros
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Michael G Schwern
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Peter Scott