On Saturday 05 May 2001 19:28, Uri Guttman wrote: > the proposed qh only fails with a key or value of => which is highly > unlikely and can be worked around as a value by inserting another => > > %foo = qh( foo bar => => baz ) > > is: > > %foo = ( foo => 1, bar => '=>', baz => 1 ) Or it could be %foo = ( foo => 1, bar => 1, '=>' => 'baz' ) But I like the concept of a quote hash. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re[2]: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns A. C. Yardley
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Siracusa
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Richard Proctor
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Uri Guttman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Peter Scott
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Mark Koopman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Bart Lateur
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Jarkko Hietaniemi