# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #130439] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130439 >
Code: my @a = <a b c d e f g>; say @a.splice: ^3 Result (2015.12,2016.07.1): [d e f g] Result (HEAD): Cannot resolve caller splice(Array: Range); none of these signatures match: (Array:D \SELF: *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, Whatever, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, Int:D $size, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, Callable:D $size, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Callable:D $size, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Whatever, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Int:D $size, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Whatever, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Callable:D $size, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Int:D $size, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever $offset, Whatever $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever $offset, Callable:D $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever $offset, Int:D $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Whatever $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Callable:D $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Int:D $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Whatever $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Callable:D $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Int:D $size, **@new, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, Whatever, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, Int:D $size, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Whatever, Callable:D $size, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Callable:D $size, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Whatever, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Callable:D $offset, Int:D $size, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Whatever, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Callable:D $size, @new, *%_) (Array:D $: Int:D $offset, Int:D $size, @new, *%_) in block <unit> at /tmp/SItA2b7BIp line 1 Bisectable points to https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f32173b2ca3a2652277b81ff381e6377632f0538 Given that the commit was attempting to improve the performance, I think the change was unintentional. However, feel free to argue that the current behavior is correct. If so, please treat this ticket as [LTA] (the amount of candidates printed is insane).