Hmmm…. in RT #128757 you expect a single value to return identity, and here you expect it not to return it? By the same reasoning that [/] “hello” returns “hello”, I think [*] set(1,2,3) should return set(1,2,3).
Or am I missing something? > On 27 Jul 2016, at 23:29, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev (via RT) > <perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev > # Please include the string: [perl #128758] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128758 > > > > Code: > say [*] set(1,2,3), set(4,5,6) > > Result: > 9 > > OK, that ↑ makes sense. > > Code: > say [*] set(1,2,3) > > Result: > set(3, 1, 2) > > Huh? I expected 3. > > Related: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128757 (single arg thing > does not really work with +) > IRC discussion: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-07-27#i_12921657
