At 04:30 PM 4/29/2001 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: >On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:44:17PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Well, I was thinking that generally the site policy would be expressed > in a > > single file > >This smells strangely familiar. Alot like the .perlrc discussion that >was had back many moons ago. The havoc a general syntax-altering >policy file could wreck would be enourmous. > >To use a Perl 5 example, consider the simple setting of "use strict" >as a general site policy. Basicaly, most of the Perl code in your >/usr/bin will explode when you try to run it. Right, that's why the policy stuff we're discussing is optional... :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloadi... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overl... John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & O... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overl... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & O... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying &a... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloadi... Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway