On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:13:30PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > Eric Roode writes: > : John Porter wrote: > : >IIUC, this ability is precisely what Larry was saying Perl6 would have. > : > : I may have my history wrong here, but didn't Ada try that? > > Not at all. The syntax of Ada was nailed down tighter that almost any > language that ever existed. In a sick way I kinda liked how compilers were able to give out error messages not unlike: foo.ada: line 231: Violation of sections 7.8.3, 9.11.5b and 10.0.16: see the LRM. (LRM being the Language Reference Manual.) Truly coding by the book. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Eric Roode
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloadi... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overl... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloadi... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overl... Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & O... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying &a... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Eric Roode
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloadi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overl... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & O... John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying &a... Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & O... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying &a... Larry Wall