On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 06:30:37PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:38:50PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: > > IMHO, . can DWIM in most cases even if it's both object deref _and_ > > concat--without paying any attention to whitespace. > > Please, no. Some of us have to *teach* this language. Then I guess that either space sensitive '.' is the answer, or '_'. I personally prefer the space sensitive '.' because it is compatible with perl5, and I think people would have less difficulty with it even if it was doing double duty in the language. And its visually easy to spot the difference between the two constructs. But if it is going to be another character, I'd definitely go with '_' over '~'. At least then we could say _= and =_, although that looks bizarre to me.. I think its really time to have a vote on this, I think that all that has been said about this issue has been said... Ed
- Dot can DWIM without whitespace Brent Dax
- C or SH like string cat proposal David L. Nicol
- Re: C or SH like string cat proposal Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dan Sugalski
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dave
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Paul Johnson
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespac... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without white... Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without w... Buddha Buck
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespac... Casey West