At 03:31 PM 4/20/2001 -0500, Garrett Goebel wrote: > > > The equivalent of an AV should store an array of values rather > > > than variables. > > > > I disagree. > > > > $a = 1; > > @b = ($a); > > $c = $b[0]; > >oops I meant: > >Wouldn't you like to preserve the possibility of allowing $c >get both the variable and value vtables of $a? The interpreter will allow both. Which is done will depend on the context things appear in. (Basically which bit of bytecode the parser spits out) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: deferred vtable assignm... Dan Sugalski
- Re: deferred vtable assignm... David L. Nicol
- Re: deferred vtable assignm... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading Kai Henningsen
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- RE: Tying & Overloading Garrett Goebel
- RE: Tying & Overloading Filipe Brandenburger
- RE: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- RE: Tying & Overloading Filipe Brandenburger
- RE: Tying & Overloading Garrett Goebel
- RE: Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- RE: Re: Tying & Overloading Brent Dax
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading nick
- Re: Tying & Overloading Austin Hastings
- Re: Tying & Overloading Michael G Schwern