Dan Sugalski wrote: > I personally would rather that perl 6 handle perl 6 code only, and leave > the compilation and interpretation of perl 5 code to perl 5. FWIW, I agree 100% with Dan. -- John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Tim Bunce
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dave Storrs
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 jc vazquez
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Buddha Buck
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern