On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I think Perl_ and maybe Perl__ would be fine. I'd rather Perl_ and _Perl_, > but... How about PerlF_ and PerlD_ (for Functions and Data)? To also specify Exported and Private we could have PerlFE_, PerlFP, etc. Dave
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc John Siracusa
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc John Siracusa
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Kai Henningsen
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Hong Zhang
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Kai Henningsen
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Brent Dax
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dave Mitchell
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Uri Guttman
- Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc Dan Sugalski