"Greg Boug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So open has to parse the string for a URL and magically use > a http protocol? Not sure I like that idea... Granted, from a > programmatical point of view that looks neater... But what > about the case where you have a file called "http:" (a legal > filename under unix if I'm not mistaken, granted though, this > is about as stupid as naming a script "test" then wondering > why it doesn't do anything when you type "test"...) > > The only way that could work is if programmers could write > handlers for open, so that it could be extended later for > new protocols (see below) Of course all of this has been discussed. (See http://archive.develooper.com/perl6-language-io%40perl.org/, especially RFCs 100 and 14.) Jon
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Greg Boug
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Greg Boug
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jon Ericson
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Damian Conway
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 jc vazquez
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Philip Newton
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Trond Michelsen
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ariel Scolnicov