At 12:38 PM 4/9/01 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >>>One liners are supposed to be SHORT. `--cmd' is LONG. If we MUST go >>>the multiflagged way, why not reflect `-e' to get the `-6' flag? At >>>the very least, I want a short flag! >> >>But by the time people learned to use '-6' we'd have Perl 7 out. > >I'm still trying to figure out why the flag needs to change. What's wrong >with -e? It seems perfectly serviceable. Because Larry said that by default Perl 6 would assume that its input was in Perl 5...? So we need a way to tell it that it isn't. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalyps... Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalyps... John Porter
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1) James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Peter Scott
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty