On Fri 06 Apr, Dan Sugalski wrote: > This is, I presume, in addition to any sort of inherent DWIMmery? I don't > see any reason that: > > @foo[1,2] = <STDIN>; > > shouldn't read just two lines from that filehandle, for example, nor why > Fair enough > @bar = @foo * 12; > > shouldn't assign to @bar all the elements of @foo multiplied by 12. (Though > others might, of course) Reasonable, but what should @bar = @foo x 2; do? Repeat @foo twice or repeat each element twice? (its current behaviour is less than useless, other than for JAPHs) Richard -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 nick
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Adam Turoff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 nick
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Siracusa
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Richard Proctor
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Richard Proctor
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeremy Howard
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp