On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:33:22PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > > I'd really rather not, and I don't think that was Larry's intention. I > > think rather it was "perl 5 warning/strict levels", not "parse as perl 5 > > code". At least I hope that's the case... > well, personally I would rather that this *is* done, because it forces perl > 6's architecture to be solid. Only as solid as Perl 5's. And remember we're throwing that one away. :) -- By God I *KNOW* what this network is for, and you can't have it. - Russ Allbery, http://www.slacker.com/rant.html
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Wiger
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Edward Peschko
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Edward Peschko
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Glenn Linderman
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ted Ashton
- Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larry's Apoca... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larr... John Porter
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: ... Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: ... John Porter
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl 5 compatibility (Re: Larr... James Mastros