Re: pitching names for the attribute for a function with no memor y or side effects

[Russ Allbery]

Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Doesn't have the right ring to it, unfortunately. It's not really
> immutable, it just has no side-effects.

gcc and the literature both use "pure"; I'd recommend that.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>