Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Aliasing is actually one of the bigger problems with C, or so I'm lead > to believe. It gets in the way of a number of optimizations rather > badly. (So say some of Compaq's C and Fortran compiler folks, and I have > no reason to doubt them. The Fortran compiler often generates faster > code than the C compiler for this reason apparently) Hence the introduction of the restrict keyword in C99 and several of gcc's attribute extensions for marking pure functions to try to get a handle on the problem. *wry grin* Yeah, that's the main thing that gets in the way of optimizing C. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Schwartzian transforms Russ Allbery
- RE: Schwartzian transforms David Whipp
- What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian transform... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzian t... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwartzi... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Hong Zhang
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... John Porter
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Russ Allbery
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Hong Zhang
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... James Mastros
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Russ Allbery
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Uri Guttman
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Dan Sugalski
- RE: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... David Whipp
- RE: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... Dan Sugalski
- Re: What can we optimize (was Re: Schwa... David L. Nicol