On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 08:32:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > DESTROY would get called twice, which is VERY BAD. > > *blink* > It is? Why? > I grant you it isn't the clearest way of programming, but "VERY BAD"? package NuclearReactor::CoolingRod; sub new { Reactor->decrease_core_temperature(); bless {}, shift } sub DESTROY { Reactor->increase_core_temperature(); } -- diff: usage diff [whatever] etc. - plan9 has a bad day
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/... John Porter
- Resource Management ? Elizabeth Mattijsen
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/... abigail
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ o... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Damien Neil
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Per... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java... James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Per... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java... abigail
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/... Simon Cozens
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ o... Damien Neil
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Damien Neil
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Hong Zhang
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Uri Guttman
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: ... Tim Bunce