On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:19:36PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > The less memory you chew through the faster your code will probably be (or > at least you'll have less overhead). Reuse is generally faster and less > resource-intensive than recycling. What's true for tin cans is true for memory. reduce, reuse, recycle. The first R might also be important :-) Nicholas Clark
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Branden
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ David Mitchell
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Branden
- Change the subject (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Branden
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Piers Cawley
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Ken Fox
- Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Ja... Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JW... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JW... Ken Fox
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JW... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Sam Tregar
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re... Branden