> >Please see my previous post on the subject. As I pointed there, implementing > >|| and && like that breaks short-circuits. > > No, it doesn't. Just because you pass in two PMCs doesn't mean that they > both need to be evaluated. Though the PDD does need to be clearer about how > that happens. Hmmm, I can't quite how that trick works. How whould the following get evaluated: $opened || open(F, ...)
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Alan Burlison
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Alan Burlison
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Branden
- Re: PDD 2, vtables David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 2, vtables David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 2, vtables Nicholas Clark