Branden wrote: > > I really would suggest a close look at CORBA's IDL. I don't know if it can > handle not-objects, as I'm sure it's desired. But I think having CORBA & IDL > support will be certainly a need in Perl6, as it was stated this was one of > the objectives behind making strong-typing possible. No, strong typing should not be an issue; lisp works with corba just fine. If lisp can do it, perl can do it. (Not to mention existing perl corba capabilities, e.g. cope...) Also, as you mention, corba idl is purely OO. A procedure interface capability can be seen in languages like Modula. -- John Porter You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Uri Guttman
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Damian Conway
- New export mechanism (Re: Really auto autoloaded modul... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Wiger
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Austin Hastings
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Branden
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules John Porter
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Branden
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Tim Bunce
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules David L. Nicol
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Nathan Torkington
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Simon Cozens
- Re: Really auto autoloaded modules Dan Sugalski