On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Edwin Steiner wrote: > - This scheme could become a mess, if abused. That's exactly what happened to Perl 5, which your scheme looks strikingly similar to. -- <Citizen_X> I detest people who get in their cars before turning off the alarm, fiddle around a bit, and then turn it off <Citizen_X> maybe they're afraid someone might steal the car in the short time before they turn off the alarm and actually get in <Citizen_X> it's a race condition, you know
- Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Edwin Steiner
- Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Branden
- Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of macr... Edwin Steiner
- Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of... Branden
- PMC vs. SV*/AV*/... in the core (... Edwin Steiner
- Re: PMC vs. SV*/AV*/... in the co... Branden
- Re: PMC vs. SV*/AV*/... in the co... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PMC vs. SV*/AV*/... in the co... Branden
- Re: PMC vs. SV*/AV*/... in the co... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PMC vs. SV*/AV*/... in the co... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Simon Cozens
- RE: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Garrett Goebel
- Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Branden
- Re: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Specifying vtable API in terms of macros? Dan Sugalski