[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It might makes sense to have some other functions giving units > since some point in the past next to time() though. How about time($) it could take an offset. Not time(30000) being the same as (time() + 30000) That would be silly; but what if time(315532800) #perl-defined to mean secs since 1970 GMT reset the internal offset to whatever you wanted? -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "gorkulator borked. Please investigate."
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Cantrell
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David L. Nicol
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nathan Wiger
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Damian Conway
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? nick
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Uri Guttman
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern