On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:53:13 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: >So nice of you to volunteer for being our help desk person man for >explaining to people why their time() just got broken :-) I'd use the same function name for both the integer version of time(), and the hires version. All you need is an optional parameter, whicch, if true, makes time() return a float. $a = time(); #same as now $b = time(undef) # idem $c = time(1) # hires -- Bart.
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- UNIX epoch issues (Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5)... Nathan Wiger
- Re: UNIX epoch issues (Re: Why shouldn't sl... Dave Storrs
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty