On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:58:01PM +0100, Bart Lateur wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:39:25 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Why the urge to move it out of the core? Should perl6 be like Python, > >where you first need to do a gazillion imports before you can do anything > >useful? Say goodbye to quick one-liners then. > > It doesn't have to be like that. Functions that are not in the core can > still be automatically loaded, but only if your code actually uses them. > That could make the perl kernel a lot smaller than it is now, and > hopefully, make it load faster. I agree dbmopen() already loads AnyDBM_File to do the real work without the user (or script) knowing, so this idea could be extended. Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Grove
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Cantrell
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi